When is it time to replace your local identity management?

0

How does your business know when it’s time to replace in-house identity management with a purchased solution?

In some parts of the business world, organizations use real spreadsheets to manage their users’ passwords and permissions.

This low-tech attempt to deal with one of the most critical issues cybersecurity challenges facing businesses today seem clearly precarious. This is because he is, not to say ripe for potential abuse by insider threats. However, this represents the most extreme end of the local culture. identity management spectrum. Many other companies are spending IT time and resources creating their own solution to the challenges of authentication and access governance.

But when might these solutions no longer prove to be adequate? When is it time for a replacement? To learn more, we read “Build vs. Buy: A Guide to Identity Management”, a white paper published by Auth0 as part of its Bundle of White Papers on Identity. Here is what we learned.

When is it time to replace your local identity management?

When he just can’t keep up

When building your own identity management, it can be tempting and profitable to try and fix the issues you are facing. Users need access, make sure bad actors can’t get in, then resolve as you go. The problem with this approach is that there are a lot of other factors that you probably won’t take into account when building your IAM from scratch.

For example, what if you need a standards-based IAM solution? If not, what if you have to follow some industry or government regulation that you weren’t aware of or didn’t consider? Can your platform handle other demands like multi-factor authentication and single sign-on?

If you are faced with these questions, either individually or as a flow of requests, maybe it’s time to rethink if it’s time to buy.

It interferes with your customers

Surprisingly, this applies to both B2B and B2C organizations. For companies concerned with Identity and Customer Access Management (CIAM), the connection is easy to follow. Customers demand smooth user experiences with little or no interference between their purchases and their purchases. If your in-house solution cannot provide this, it should immediately prompt you to start looking for a replacement. The same is true if you cannot enroll new customers quickly and cannot directly accumulate valuable data from consumers.

However, B2B companies also need to think about their customers as they need to provide platforms that can accommodate multiple forms of identity management from multiple companies as they require their own single sign-on options. At the same time, you will need to be able to delegate IT requests from customers to your IT department, which an in-house solution can struggle to do.

When your IT department needs a break

In-house identity management places a huge demand on your IT security team, both in its initial build and maintenance. It is a lot of time, energy and money for your in-house solution when these resources could be invested in other basic computing tasks as well. Take a look at your budget and talk to your security team about what they do on average each day. Perhaps buying a solution can benefit you in the long run.

You can find out more in “Build vs. Buy: A Guide to Identity Management”, a white paper published by Auth0 as part of its Bundle of White Papers on Identity. Also consult the Solution review suggestion engine and Buyer’s Guide.

Ben Canner
Latest articles by Ben Canner (see everything)


Source link

Share.

Leave A Reply